Book Navigation

Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy.

Overview
Title:
Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy.
Authors:
Van der Wees PJ, Hendriks EJ, Custers JW, Burgers JS, Dekker J, de Bie RA
Journal:
BMC Health Serv Res.
Publication date:
2007 Nov
Volume:
23
First page:
7
Last page:
191
Link to pubmed:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18036215
Link to full text:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/191
Publication type:
Journal
Free text

BACKGROUND:

Clinical guidelines are considered important instruments to improve quality in health care. Since 1998 the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF) produced evidence-based clinical guidelines, based on a standardized program. New developments in the field of guideline research raised the need to evaluate and update the KNGF guideline program. Purpose of this study is to compare different guideline development programs and review the KNGF guideline program for physical therapy in the Netherlands, in order to update the program.

METHOD:

Six international guideline development programs were selected, and the 23 criteria of the AGREE Instrument were used to evaluate the guideline programs. Information about the programs was retrieved from published handbooks of the organizations. Also, the Dutch program for guideline development in physical therapy was evaluated using the AGREE criteria. Further comparison the six guideline programs was carried out using the following elements of the guideline development processes: Structure and organization; Preparation and initiation; Development; Validation; Dissemination and implementation; Evaluation and update.

RESULTS:

Compliance with the AGREE criteria of the guideline programs was high. Four programs addressed 22 AGREE criteria, and two programs addressed 20 AGREE criteria. The previous Dutch program for guideline development in physical therapy lacked in compliance with the AGREE criteria, meeting only 13 criteria. Further comparison showed that all guideline programs perform systematic literature searches to identify the available evidence. Recommendations are formulated and graded, based on evidence and other relevant factors. It is not clear how decisions in the development process are made. In particular, the process of translating evidence into practice recommendations can be improved.

CONCLUSION:

As a result of international developments and consensus, the described processes for developing clinical practice guidelines have much in common. The AGREE criteria are common basis for the development of guidelines, although it is not clear how final decisions are made. Detailed comparison of the different guideline programs was used for updating the Dutch program. As a result the updated KNGF program complied with 22 AGREE criteria. International discussion is continuing and will be used for further improvement of the program.

Preview

Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy. Van der Wees PJ, Hendriks EJ, Custers JW, Burgers JS, Dekker J, de Bie RA. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Nov; 23:7-191.

Page last updated: Oct 17, 2011
Copyright © 2002-2016 Guidelines International Network.
All rights reserved

The Guidelines International Network is formally constituted as a Scottish Guarantee Company under Company Number SC243691 and recognised as a Scottish Charity under Scottish Charity Number SC034047 with its Registered Office at J. & H. Mitchell W.S., 51 Atholl Road, Pitlochry, Perthshire PH16 5BU, Scotland.

Back to top