Book Navigation

Grading recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: randomised experimental evaluation of four different systems.

Overview
Title:
Grading recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: randomised experimental evaluation of four different systems.
Authors:
Cuello García CA, Pacheco Alvarado KP, Pérez Gaxiola G
Journal:
Arch Dis Child
Publication date:
2011
Volume:
96
Issue:
8
First page:
723
Last page:
728
ISSN:
1468-2044
Link to pubmed:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21596725
Publication type:
Journal
Free text

Objective To evaluate the effect of presenting a recommendation in a clinical practice guideline using different grading systems to determine to what extent the system used changes the clinician's eventual response to a particular clinical question. Design Randomised experimental study. Setting Clinician offices and academic settings. Participants Paediatricians and paediatric residents in private and public practice in Mexico. Intervention Case notes of a child with diarrhoea and a question about clinician preference for using racecadotril. The same evidence was provided in a clinical recommendation but with different presentations according to the following grading systems: NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence), SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network), GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and CEBM (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Oxford). Main outcome measure Mean change in direction from baseline response (measured on a 10 cm visual scale and a Likert scale) and among groups. Results 216 subjects agreed to participate. Most participants changed their decision after reading the clinical recommendations (mean difference 0.7 cm, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.0; p<0.001). By groups, mean change (95% CI) from baseline was 0.04 (-0.68 to 0.77) for NICE, 0.31 (-0.41 to 1.05) for SIGN, 2.18 (1.48 to 2.88) for GRADE and 0.08 (-0.52 to 0.69) for CEBM (p=0.007 between groups). In a final survey, a small difference was noted regarding the clarity of the results presented with the GRADE system. Conclusion The clinician's decision to use a therapy was influenced most by the GRADE system. Trial registration number NCT00940290.

Preview

Grading recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: randomised experimental evaluation of four different systems. Cuello García CA, Pacheco Alvarado KP, Pérez Gaxiola G. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96(8):723-728.

Page last updated: Dec 10, 2011
Copyright © 2002-2016 Guidelines International Network.
All rights reserved

The Guidelines International Network is formally constituted as a Scottish Guarantee Company under Company Number SC243691 and recognised as a Scottish Charity under Scottish Charity Number SC034047 with its Registered Office at J. & H. Mitchell W.S., 51 Atholl Road, Pitlochry, Perthshire PH16 5BU, Scotland.

Back to top