Book Navigation

Presenting the results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a consumer audience: a qualitative study.

Overview
Title:
Presenting the results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a consumer audience: a qualitative study.
Authors:
Glenton C, Santesso N, Rosenbaum S, Nilsen ES, Rader T, Ciapponi A, Dilkes H
Journal:
Med Decis Making
Publication date:
2010
Volume:
30
Issue:
5
First page:
566
Last page:
77
ISSN:
1552-681X
Link to pubmed:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20643912
Publication type:
Journal
Free text

OBJECTIVE: To develop and obtain feedback about a summary format for Cochrane reviews that is accessible to a consumer audience, without oversimplification or incorrect presentation.

METHODS: We developed 3 versions of a Plain Language Summary (PLS) format of a Cochrane Systematic Review. Using a semi-structured interview guide we tested these versions among 34 members of the public in Norway, Argentina, Canada, and Australia. The authors analyzed feedback, identified problems, and generated new solutions before retesting to produce a final version of a Plain Language Summary format.

RESULTS: Participants preferred results presented as words, supplemented by numbers in a table. There was a lack of understanding regarding the difference between a review and an individual study, that the effect is rarely an exact number, that evidence can be of low or high quality, and that level of quality is a separate issue from intervention effect. Participants also found it difficult to move between presentations of dichotomous and continuous outcomes. Rephrasing the introduction helped participants grasp the concept of a review. Confidence intervals were largely ignored or misunderstood. Our attempts to explain them were only partially successful. Text modifiers (''probably,'' ''may'') to convey different levels of quality were only partially understood, whereas symbols with explanations were more helpful. Participants often understood individual information elements about effect size and quality of these results, but did not always actively merge these elements.

CONCLUSION: Through testing and iteration the authors identified and addressed several problems, using explanations, rephrasing, and symbols to present scientific concepts. Other problems remain, including how best to present confidence intervals and continuous outcomes. Future research should also test information elements in combination rather than in isolation. The new Plain Language Summary format is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

Preview

Presenting the results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a consumer audience: a qualitative study. Glenton C, Santesso N, Rosenbaum S, Nilsen ES, Rader T, Ciapponi A et al. Med Decis Making 2010; 30(5):566-77.

Page last updated: Jan 19, 2011
Copyright © 2002-2016 Guidelines International Network.
All rights reserved

The Guidelines International Network is formally constituted as a Scottish Guarantee Company under Company Number SC243691 and recognised as a Scottish Charity under Scottish Charity Number SC034047 with its Registered Office at J. & H. Mitchell W.S., 51 Atholl Road, Pitlochry, Perthshire PH16 5BU, Scotland.

Back to top